Now it is time for me to take a stand on this as well.
And to give a glimpse as to my own perspective, as a response to Coxwell's comments.
I have seen and read nearly every post at Casinomeister regarding the virtual group, followed the long history of slow payouts (2-4 months), No payouts, screwy terms and conditions, hidden affiliations, the "commission" and all the other history this group has built... I saw and read with interest The Meisters own efforts to do something similar to the new leaf concept, resulting in his lifting them out of the rouges pit for nearly 9 month's, giving them a probationary period to make good and settle some of the grievances of the time... Yes I know and Knew the history.
Yet when I came here to LCB I found that a large number of people here DO play at these casinos. They Play free chips... They deposit... They make requests for withdrawals... and oddly they were getting paid albeit glacially slow compared to other sites... but there was enough of an indication, to me, that there was a core of members here that do use these casinos for their gambling.
The Virtual group is one of the largest and oldest RTG operators out there, and I agree... that should give them the ability to be cutting edge and leading the pack in terms of payout times. For the longest time... they were literally the only game in town if you wished to play RTG. Similar to Microsoft... it was play by our rules or dont play. As Microsoft found out though, monopolies get broken up, new players emerge that make, just by doing it right, you look like a fool and force you to revise your strategy or go the way of the old IBM.
When Prism Aff Mang first signed on and introduced herself I was as cynical and skeptical as anyone out there... and said it. To which she responded " What would you consider "change". If you follow back to the beginnings of the "New Leaf" concept you will see that the changes I felt needed to be shown were to get payouts processed and payed out in a reasonable time frame, one that is compatible with the rest of the "reputable" industry. That would be 5-7 business days, as posted by such sites as
Rushmore,
Inetbet and
Clubworld, in their Terms and Conditions. I agreed that this would be nearly impossible at the moment... But is an end Goal.
Instead, as a first hurdle I challenged them to Honor the time frame for payouts, as laid out by their own Terms and Conditions that being the 15 days. There was also a challenge to get bring the Customer service up to snuff, to stamp out some of the terminal excuses and misleading comments I had been consistently seeing and give some transparency into complaints, clarifying T&C issues and generally making a safer playing environment for those who choose to play there.
While I think that playing and depositing at these casinos should still be approached with caution, And I take stories like Meglingtons and Enough others like hers to raise serious concerns, I also think that the effort being made by Ingrid has been a positive change that has helped members here feel they stand a sporting chance of playing and potentially receiving a winning in under 3 months time.
Can Virtual get down to the 72 hour bar that other sites are currently consistently hitting... Yes... if they feel it is profitable to do so. The market will drive them to it, just as Microsoft was driven to become competitive. And if they feel they can tap into that market by cleaning up their past history.
Do I think they are there yet... No.
But I do think they are on the right track, as long as they stick to it. This is no longer the late 90's early Aughts, What worked then is no longer a viable business plan now, The Market has grown exponentially world wide and Virtual can decide to be a happy and doomed dinosaur... or evolve. That choice is theirs.
If, as they work towards evolution, I can make it a bit safer for our own members by not slamming the door in their faces and give them a chance to make their own case... I feel that it is worth doing.
I, is as in me... Jimbeaux.
LCB's official position on this is that the Warnings that are posted for these casino's were fully warranted and justly earned. Removing them without compelling evidence or reason will be approached just as the decision to place them... based on the actions of the casinos. I respect that stance and support it.