Ladbrokes refuse to pay out over white Christmas bet


Ladbrokes at centre of a GBP 7 million row on weather bets

InfoPowa readers will recall last week's interesting backgrounder on betting on snow in London, and the definition of a snowfall in this regard. This week the subject of betting on whether snow would fall more widely in Britain was in the headlines, but it was unfortunately in a negative sense as a row over a disputed bet.

At the centre of the furore was the major UK online and land gambling group Ladbrokes, which according to a wide range of UK media is refusing to pay out more than GBP 7 million to a man who gambled on a white Christmas.

The contentious part is that Ladbrokes claims it is justified in refusing to pay out because the bet was accepted by mistake.

Gambling man Cliff Bryant (52) had placed two GBP 5 accumulator bets that snow would fall on 24 towns and cities across the north of England on Christmas Day. And, as anyone watching UK news now knows, his prediction was fulfilled.

“We have apologised to the customer for any confusion and for mistakenly accepting an accumulator bet when our own rules state that only single bets are available on a market of this nature,” said a Ladbrokes spokesman. “We are happy to void the bets and to pay the customer his winnings on the relevant singles.”

That is hardly likely to appease the punter, because it is worth a mere GBP 31.78, rather than the GBP 7.1 million Bryant was expecting .

The graphic designer from Southampton, who told the local Southern Daily Echo newspaper that he would seek legal advice, claims the first accumulator would have won him GBP 4.9 million, with the second adding GBP 2.2 million.

“If I make a mistake in my work like that it costs me dearly and I think the offer should be a lot more generous than they have made,” he told the paper, clearly prepared to agree to a settlement at the right sort of offer.

Ladbrokes should have made their rules clearer, he added. “They are one of the leading bookmakers in the country and I think they ought to do their homework a bit better in future.”

Ladbrokes gave Bryant details of the Independent Betting Adjudication Service, an impartial adjudicator on disputes that arise between gambling operators and their customers, but in the meantime the publicity coverage on the dispute has been wide and not entirely positive.

General Gambling News

Login to post a comment:


 
 

Click Here to register a new account

What's going on right now!

2mins ago someone from United States read article More Online Gambling Moves by Bally Technologies

Casino Community

Share this page on:
Follow LCB on:
Follow LCB

Casino Of The Month

Casino of the Month

In the last 24h

Totals

  • New Members
    18
  • Members Online
    310
  • Guests
    1,785
Highest Community Rated Online Casinos
NextCasino
  (101 Ratings)
Bet365 Games
  (117 Ratings)
CasinoLuck
  (163 Ratings)
Betsson Casino
  (150 Ratings)
BitCasino.io
  (103 Ratings)
Guts Casino
  (119 Ratings)
Redbet Casino
  (96 Ratings)
Unibet Casino
  (94 Ratings)
Intertops Casino Classic
  (73 Ratings)
Betsafe Casino
  (126 Ratings)
3Dice Casino
  (166 Ratings)
Spin Palace Casino
  (88 Ratings)
Slotty Vegas
  (59 Ratings)
Thrills Casino
  (89 Ratings)
Liberty Slots Casino
  (117 Ratings)
32 Red Casino
  (198 Ratings)
Mr Green Casino
  (228 Ratings)
Uptown Aces
  (76 Ratings)
ComeOn Casino
  (177 Ratings)
Winner Casino
  (290 Ratings)
Casino Saga
  (70 Ratings)
Vera John Casino
  (135 Ratings)
Jetbull Casino
  (67 Ratings)
Casumo
  (85 Ratings)
BETAT Casino
  (135 Ratings)
Sin City Casino
  (67 Ratings)
River Nile Casino
  (77 Ratings)
BetsKING
  (13 Ratings)
Whitebet Casino
  (63 Ratings)
Ladbrokes Casino
  (118 Ratings)


Follow LCB on Facebook Follow LCB on Twitter Follow LCB on Pinterest Follow LCB on Google plus