Clarification from Malta (update)


LGA slates 'unnecessary concerns' and 'mere speculation'

It would appear that it takes a substantial amount of publicity to wring a comment from the Malta online gambling regulator, the LGA. After widespread news coverage on a reported provision in Malta law concerning gambling debts being unenforceable, the LGA ignored requests for comment, but last week published a clarification on its website.

Characterising the genuine fears of players regarding the law as the media creation of 'unnecessary concerns' and 'mere speculation', the regulator said in its website statement:

"This Public Notice is being issued in order to clarify a legal issue which has been circulating various blogs and news headlines in relation to Player Winnings and Gaming Debts.

"Kindly note that the provisions being invoked in relation to Gaming Debts, are extracts from the Civil Code, refer to Chapter 16 of the Laws of Malta (refer to articles 1713-1717A) which are not applicable to Games which are authorised/licensed under the Gaming Act, Chapter 400 of the Laws of Malta (refer to article 34) and to Games authorised/licensed under the Lotteries and Other Games Act, Chapter 438 of the Laws of Malta (refer to articles 48 and 49) and the Regulations issued there under, which include the Remote Gaming Regulations.

"The Lotteries and Gaming Authority's interpretation is that the Civil Code articles above captioned are applicable to gaming debts arising out of unauthorised/unlicensed games, which in any case are considered as illegal and tantamount to a criminal offence."

Translation: gambling debts are enforceable in Malta provided the gambling establishment concerned is licensed by the LGA.

The issue arose from a complaint made to the LGA by an online player, who claimed that Casino Club.com had wrongfully deprived him of a Euro 167 500 progressive jackpot that he had won whilst a member in good standing . The LGA found in favour of the casino, but its reasoning has not been made public.

The regulator has not responded to media enquiries as to its finding, and on what grounds, and the website notice makes no reference to the controversial ruling (see lengthy thread on the issue here: http://www.casinomeister.com/forums/online-casinos/30072-q-casino-club-real-player-concerning-confiscations-winnings.html)

The player is presently engaged with a Malta lawyer to pursue the issue further.

The LGA notice can be found here: http://www.lga.org.mt/lga/content.aspx?id=229374

General Gambling News Casino Software Gambling Law & Society News

Login to post a comment:


 
 

Click Here to register a new account

What's going on right now!

5mins ago someone from China read article Major deal for Barcrest

Casino Community

Share this page on:
Follow LCB on:
Follow LCB

Casino Of The Month

Casino of the Month

In the last 24h

Totals

  • New Members
    25
  • Members Online
    359
  • Guests
    2,224
Highest Community Rated Online Casinos
NextCasino
  (110 Ratings)
Bet365 Games
  (128 Ratings)
CasinoLuck
  (172 Ratings)
Betsson Casino
  (162 Ratings)
Guts Casino
  (127 Ratings)
Unibet Casino
  (99 Ratings)
BitCasino.io
  (116 Ratings)
Redbet Casino
  (102 Ratings)
Betsafe Casino
  (134 Ratings)
Spin Palace Casino
  (90 Ratings)
Liberty Slots Casino
  (126 Ratings)
Slotty Vegas
  (68 Ratings)
Intertops Casino Classic
  (77 Ratings)
ComeOn Casino
  (187 Ratings)
Mr Green Casino
  (236 Ratings)
Thrills Casino
  (98 Ratings)
Winner Casino
  (297 Ratings)
Vera John Casino
  (141 Ratings)
3Dice Casino
  (190 Ratings)
Jetbull Casino
  (72 Ratings)
Casumo
  (88 Ratings)
River Nile Casino
  (79 Ratings)
Uptown Aces
  (84 Ratings)
32 Red Casino
  (228 Ratings)
Intertops Red Casino
  (82 Ratings)
Whitebet Casino
  (65 Ratings)
BETAT Casino
  (144 Ratings)
Ruby Fortune Casino
  (113 Ratings)
Sin City Casino
  (69 Ratings)
Crazy Vegas
  (127 Ratings)


Follow LCB on Facebook Follow LCB on Twitter Follow LCB on Pinterest Follow LCB on Google plus